Re: texdoctk-warn or perltk-warn or ...
On 07.05.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> In the last couple of days I found out that there are more programs
> than only texdoctk that use Tk, namely (some of) the scripts in
> texmf/context/perltk (run by symlink magic from /usr/bin/texexec).
>
> Therefore I would like to patch them similarly as we patch texdoctk
> (and we should think about creating menu entries for them).
>
> This means, on the other hand, that the name "texdoctk-warn" isn't
> very suitable, then. Maybe perltk-warn would fit better. But then
> we can't use it if next time it is something else in Recommends
> than Tk that is missing.
>
> notinstalled-warn?
> package-warn?
>
Sounds too generic to me. No file clash in unstable, but I think, we
should name it more tetex-related. Senseful name? tetex-warn?
H.
--
THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE
http://hilmarpreusse.forum-rheinland.de/
Reply to: