Bug#203810: marked as done (tetex-extra: plain.fmt does not exist)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:15:08 +0200
with message-id <87isfnt80z.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
and subject line Bug#203810: tetex-extra: plain.fmt does not exist
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2003 21:02:19 +0000
>From ecki@lina.inka.de Fri Aug 01 16:02:16 2003
Return-path: <ecki@lina.inka.de>
Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [193.197.184.2]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19ih2W-0004dQ-00; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:02:16 -0500
Received: from calista.inka.de (p508b217b.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.33.123])
by mail.inka.de with asmtp
id 19ih2V-00042x-00; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:02:15 +0200
Received: from ecki by calista.inka.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19ih2T-0002if-00; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:02:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-extra: plain.fmt does not exist
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:02:13 +0200
Message-Id: <E19ih2T-0002if-00@calista.inka.de>
Sender: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 2.0.2-4.1
Severity: minor
whiel updating tetex-bin and tetex-extra i get the following error message:
...
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mf.base installed.
fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mfw.base installed.
ln: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/plain.fmt': File exists
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/plain.fmt not a
file.
Output of initex is in /tmp/textlj0kg
Output of updmap is in /tmp/updmBkhOVA
...
Setting up tetex-extra (2.0.2-4.1) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Running initex for missing formats. This may take some time. ...
ln: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/plain.fmt': File exists
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/plain.fmt not a
file.
Output of initex is in /tmp/texmxDwDI
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux calista 2.4.20-xfs #15 Sat Jun 7 01:56:27 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US@euro
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.10 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii gsfonts 6.0-2.1 Fonts for the ghostscript interpre
ii perl-tk 1:800.024-1.1 Perl module providing the Tk graph
ii tetex-base 2.0.2-4.1 basic teTeX library files
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-4.2 teTeX binary files
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203810-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2004 09:23:07 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Mon Apr 26 02:23:07 2004
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from balu1.urz.unibas.ch [131.152.1.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BI2KR-0003ID-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 02:23:07 -0700
Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (bioz6-allgem17.bioz.unibas.ch [131.152.17.45])
by balu1.urz.unibas.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3Q9N46G006056;
Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:23:04 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BI2Ci-0003Fu-00; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:15:08 +0200
To: Bernd Eckenfels <be-mail2004@lina.inka.de>
Cc: 203810-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#203810: tetex-extra: plain.fmt does not exist
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040424154912.GA5197@lina.inka.de> (Bernd Eckenfels's message
of "Sat, 24 Apr 2004 17:49:12 +0200")
References: <E19ih2T-0002if-00@calista.inka.de>
<[🔎] 87hdvax0b7.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
<[🔎] 20040424154912.GA5197@lina.inka.de>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:15:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87isfnt80z.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 203810-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Bernd Eckenfels <be-mail2004@lina.inka.de> wrote:
> I feel sorry for not providing more info. I think it is minor, because the
> update did not failed comletely.
Personally, I never regard errors during the installation phase as
minor. Even if they seem to be minor in your installation, the same
error may break lots of packages in a different configuration. But never
mind.=20
> I would suggest to close this bug as unreproducible, at least it does not
> happen if I reupdate it now. bin:2.0.2-6 and extra:2.0.2-10
I'm closing it. You know that you can do this yourself, as the
submitter, by sending mail to the -done address?
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: