Re: what about tetex-extra.preinst
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
> On 08.04.04 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:
>> Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
>> > drachi:[debian] >rgrep m4 *
>> > CVS/Entries:/tetex-preinst.m4/1.1/Tue Feb 19 00:50:28 2002//
>> > changelog: * move Build-Depends to Build-Depends-Indep in right place and add m4
>> > control:Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), po-debconf, m4, sharutils
>> > rules:# m4 -DTETEX_BASE debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/preinst
>> > rules:# m4 debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/tetex-extra.preinst
>> >
>> > Any good reason to keep a B-D on m4 out there?
>>
>> I don't know. I'm not familiar with that stuff, and simple testing
>> isn't possible, because we need flex and bison, which depend on m4.
>>
> Does tetex-base really has a B-D on flex and bison?
No, I was just stupid: I had been working on tetex-bin all the time, and
it's debian/control was open, and therefore I took m4 out of its
build-dependencies and tested.
It works well with tetex-base, of course.
Thank you, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: