Re: what about tetex-extra.preinst
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
> drachi:[debian] >rgrep tetex-preinst.m4 *
> CVS/Entries:/tetex-preinst.m4/1.1/Tue Feb 19 00:50:28 2002//
> rules:# m4 -DTETEX_BASE debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/preinst
> rules:# m4 debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/tetex-extra.preinst
>
> drachi:[debian] >rgrep m4 *
> CVS/Entries:/tetex-preinst.m4/1.1/Tue Feb 19 00:50:28 2002//
> changelog: * move Build-Depends to Build-Depends-Indep in right place and add m4
> control:Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), po-debconf, m4, sharutils
> rules:# m4 -DTETEX_BASE debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/preinst
> rules:# m4 debian/tetex-preinst.m4 > debian/tetex-extra.preinst
>
> Any good reason to keep a B-D on m4 out there?
I don't know. I'm not familiar with that stuff, and simple testing isn't
possible, because we need flex and bison, which depend on m4. I don't
have any idea whether it can be imagined that they will ever loose this
dependency, though.
Should I remove it?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: