Hi Hilmar, Am Montag, den 13.12.2004, 11:52 +0100 schrieb Hilmar Preusse: > On 12.12.04 Kilian Krause (kk@verfaction.de) wrote: > > Hi, > > > apparently the default broken letters typesetting can be majorly > > improved by using the KHM package from: > > http://www.lg.fukuoka-u.ac.jp/~ynagata/khmpackage.html > > > > That page has a spreadsheet comparing different styles and > > concludes that all of which are faulty and need fixing. This fixing > > is done in KHM. > > > Thanks for the report. No prob. I have only poked it around a bit and it seems to work fine for me for what i needed. Yet, i'm no typist and i've no idea if what the webpage lists as requirements is factually true. The other very sophisticated LaTeX package for broken letters seems to be: http://www.uni-frankfurt.de/~muehlich/tex/texindex.html If you are more experienced in typesetting and layout rules and can verify either one of these packages does offer a "best practice", then i'd be happy to know the outcome of the expertise. > Unfortunately in the package itself I couldn't find a license > statement. The docs textdatabase1819khm.pdf and khmpackage.pdf are > not readable to me. There's demo files as *.tex which suited well enough as a hands-on-demo to me (running straight down the "Installation" part of the webpage). Yet i haven't bothered reading them, but rather been using them as a template to copy the usepackage lines. > Do you know under what license the package is and if not would you be > so kind to clarify it, before we forward that bug to upstream? Sorry, no idea. I guess upstream is the best place to ask for that. -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil