Bug#200264: tetex-bin upgrade fails: conflict with texdoctk
On 07.07.03 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:
Hi,
> > If texdoctk is folded into tetex-bin, the latter probably needs
> > some additional dependencies, such as those for texdoctk, right?
> >
> Yes, they should. Let me see, what do we need additionally:
> perl-tk, mime-support. postscript-viewer and pdf-viewer are only in
> Suggests. The latter 2 are needed by texdoc (which is already in
> tetex-bin). Perhaps we should raise it up to Recommends...
> Missing is in every case w3m | www-browser and
> xterm | x-terminal-emulator. Dunno if we need it in Depends or if
> Suggests is sufficient.
>
patch added. I've added the stuff only in Suggests. Should be
sufficient. In Depend additionally perl-tk and mime-support.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--- control.old Tue Jul 8 16:07:24 2003
+++ control Tue Jul 8 16:14:16 2003
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
Conflicts: texbin, xdvik, mflib, kpathsea, makeindex, ps2pk, latex, nextawg (<= 0.5.1-34), nextaw (<< 0.8-2), dvipdfm, alml (<< 2002.08.29-4), jbibtex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), jtex-bin (<= 1.8-5.1), passivetex (<< 1.21-5), ptex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), xmltex (<< 1.9-4), cweb, texdoctk
Provides: tex, latex, dvips, dvipsk, xdvi, metafont, dvipdfm, cweb, texdoctk
Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.6.8)
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, tetex-base (>> 2.0.2-3), ed, debianutils (>= 1.13.1), debconf (>= 0.2.26)
-Suggests: lpr, gs | gs-aladdin, postscript-viewer, pdf-viewer, tetex-extra, texinfo
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, perl-tk, tetex-base (>> 2.0.2-3), ed, debianutils (>= 1.13.1), debconf (>= 0.2.26), mime-support
+Suggests: lpr, tetex-extra, texinfo, postscript-viewer, pdf-viewer, www-browser, x-terminal-emulator, gs | gs-aladdin
Recommends: dialog, psutils, texi2html
Description: teTeX binary files
This is teTeX, a TeX distribution for UNIX compatible systems.
Reply to: