Bug#200264: tetex-bin upgrade fails: conflict with texdoctk
If texdoctk is folded into tetex-bin, the latter probably needs some
additional dependencies, such as those for texdoctk, right?
Or will they get picked up automatically?
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:35:45PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> tags + 200264 patch
> thanks
>
> On 06.07.03 Ross Boylan (RossBoylan@stanfordalumni.org) wrote:
>
> > # apt-get -qu install tetex-bin
> > Reading Package Lists...
> > Building Dependency Tree...
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> > libkpathsea3 tetex-base
> > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > dvipdfm
> > The following packages will be upgraded
> > # I got a bunch of screens asking me various configuration options
> > Preconfiguring packages ...
> > (Reading database ... 181923 files and directories currently
> > installed.)
> > Removing dvipdfm ...
> > Removing `diversion of /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics/dvipdfm.def
> > to /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics/dvipdfm.def.tetex by dvipdfm'
> > texhash: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> > texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
> > texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
> > texhash: Done.
> > (Reading database ... 181898 files and directories currently
> > installed.)
> > Preparing to replace tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-8 (using
> > .../tetex-bin_2.0.2-4.1_i386.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement tetex-bin ...
> > dpkg: error processing
> > /usr/var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-bin_2.0.2-4.1_i386.deb (--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/texdoctk.1.gz', which is
> > also in package texdoctk
> >
> > I tried apt-get -qu upgrade after this, but got about the same errors.
> > apt-get -qu install tetex-bin texdoctk also didn't work.
> >
> There is no separate texdoctk-package any more. tetex-bin should
> provide, replace it and conflict with it from now, at least until we
> decid to split off texdoctk again from the tetex-package (at least
> 2 bugs are speaking about that).
>
> H.
> +++ control Mon Jul 7 16:27:12 2003
> @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@
> Package: tetex-bin
> Priority: optional
> Architecture: any
> -Replaces: texbin, xdvik, mflib, kpathsea, makeindex, ps2pk, latex, tetex-base (<< 2.0.1), texidoc, dvipdfm, cweb
> -Conflicts: texbin, xdvik, mflib, kpathsea, makeindex, ps2pk, latex, nextawg (<= 0.5.1-34), nextaw (<< 0.8-2), dvipdfm, alml (<< 2002.08.29-4), jbibtex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), jtex-bin (<= 1.8-5.1), passivetex (<< 1.21-5), ptex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), xmltex (<< 1.9-4), cweb
> -Provides: tex, latex, dvips, dvipsk, xdvi, metafont, dvipdfm, cweb
> +Replaces: texbin, xdvik, mflib, kpathsea, makeindex, ps2pk, latex, tetex-base (<< 2.0.1), texidoc, dvipdfm, cweb, texdoctk
> +Conflicts: texbin, xdvik, mflib, kpathsea, makeindex, ps2pk, latex, nextawg (<= 0.5.1-34), nextaw (<< 0.8-2), dvipdfm, alml (<< 2002.08.29-4), jbibtex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), jtex-bin (<= 1.8-5.1), passivetex (<< 1.21-5), ptex-bin (<< 3.0.5+0.04-2), xmltex (<< 1.9-4), cweb, texdoctk
> +Provides: tex, latex, dvips, dvipsk, xdvi, metafont, dvipdfm, cweb, texdoctk
> Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.6.8)
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, tetex-base (>> 2.0.2-3), ed, debianutils (>= 1.13.1), debconf (>= 0.2.26)
> Suggests: lpr, gs | gs-aladdin, postscript-viewer, pdf-viewer, tetex-extra, texinfo
Reply to: