Re: tetex-bin/base change in CVS
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:34:08PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> It seemed formerly deleted files were missing (e.x. booktabs.dvi)
> and empty directories too.
Yuck.
> I tried to add these as possible as I can but I might overlooked
> some files or directories.
Oh.
> Some remarks:
> - if there are any CVS subdirectory in a new *.orig.tar.gz then
> cvs-upgrade caused an error.
Yup.
> - if there are any symlinks in a new *.orig.tar.gz then
> cvs-upgrade caused an error.
Yup.
> And there were 2 CVS directories
> ./texk/xdvik/CVS
> ./texk/xdvik/texmf/CVS
> and I deleted them too.
Please report these to Thomas upstream.
> I doubt that CVS is really effective to maintain tetex packages
> with group of maintainers.
It's probably the best we have at present :-(
(I don't know how some of the newer projects are coming along,
though.)
It may be that most of CVS itself is OK for us, but cvs-upgrade is
not.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: