Bug#151454: is auto correct option?

To: mxu@cae.wisc.edu, 151454@bugs.debian.org, rene@debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 11:58:15 +0900 (JST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030101.115815.74748559.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Reply-to: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 151454@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021231145356.GC30324@mail.cae.wisc.edu>
References: <[🔎] 20021231113827.GB15051@rene-engelhard.de> <[🔎] 20021231120324.GA20272@rene-engelhard.de> <[🔎] 20021231145356.GC30324@mail.cae.wisc.edu>

reassign 151454 muttprint
thanks

From: Min Xu <mxu@cae.wisc.edu>
Subject: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:53:56 -0600

> I guess the only thing here is that if auto was not one of the valid
> option, Muttprint should not have that in its comment.

I think so too and so reassign this to muttprint.

Thanks,			       2003-1-1(Wed)

-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
  - From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
  - From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
- Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
  - From: Min Xu <mxu@cae.wisc.edu>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Next by Date: dvipdfm
Previous by thread: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread