Processed: Re: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?

To: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Cc: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>(muttprint #151454), teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>(tetex-base #151454)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 21:03:04 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.104138990515243.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030101.115815.74748559.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20030101.115815.74748559.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 151454 muttprint
Bug#151454: tetex-base: \usepackage[auto]{inputenc} doesn't work
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-base' to `muttprint'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
  - From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Next by Date: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Previous by thread: Bug#151454: is auto correct option?
Next by thread: Bug#119531: latin9.def is present now
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread