Bug#151454: is auto correct option?

[Min Xu <mxu@cae.wisc.edu>]

On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:03:24PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi - the third time :)
> 
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > 
> > Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Min Xu wrote:
> > > > The bug report was for muttprint. It was muttprint used [auto]
> > > > option which caused the tetex to be unhappy.
> > > 
> > > No. Muttprint uses the charset specified in /etc/Muttprintrc.
> > > I admit, that the comments lead to the thought auto will work.
> > > 
> > > That's the case why I reassigned the bug to the tetex-base because I do
> > > not assume that auto did not work ever, otherwise Bernhard hasn't
> > > wrote that comment....
> > > 
> > > To use muttprint for now, specify one of the latinX fonts
> > 
> > ... what's the default in the muttprint packages since long time (in
> > testing/unstable)
> 
> I just looked into the package in stable. There is latin1 default too....
> 
I guess auto was one of the available option in /etc/Muttprint. Since
I am not native English speaker, I chose auto in the hope of my language
would be supported.

I just checked again, I think my current setting doesn't support Chinese
either. :-(

I guess the only thing here is that if auto was not one of the valid
option, Muttprint should not have that in its comment.

-Min

-- 
Rapid keystrokes and painless deletions often leave a writer satisfied with
work that is merely competent.
  -- "Writing Well" Donald Hall and Sven Birkerts