Hi - the third time :) Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi again, > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Min Xu wrote: > > > The bug report was for muttprint. It was muttprint used [auto] > > > option which caused the tetex to be unhappy. > > > > No. Muttprint uses the charset specified in /etc/Muttprintrc. > > I admit, that the comments lead to the thought auto will work. > > > > That's the case why I reassigned the bug to the tetex-base because I do > > not assume that auto did not work ever, otherwise Bernhard hasn't > > wrote that comment.... > > > > To use muttprint for now, specify one of the latinX fonts > > ... what's the default in the muttprint packages since long time (in > testing/unstable) I just looked into the package in stable. There is latin1 default too.... Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
pgpUqN1wsb36W.pgp
Description: PGP signature