Bug#87699: tetex-bin: Please don't. A "suggests" and possibly a warning on install is better
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Subject: Re: Bug#87699: tetex-bin: Please don't. A "suggests" and possibly a warning on install is better
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 07:07:27 +0900
> "C.M. Connelly" <c@eskimo.com> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Sorry to have not chimed in earlier, but wouldn't a better
> > solution be to have the tetex-bin in potato provide a virtual
> > package called ``texi2html'' that is then replaced by the real
> > texi2html package in woody?
>
> We don't have a time machine.
>
> We can only compensate for past problems with some hack.
I am not sure but doesn't
Build-Depends: tetex-bin (<= 1.0.6-7) | texi2html (>= 1.64)
work?
Or those packages could include texi2html in themselves
for building only...
From: "C.M. Connelly" <c@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#87699: tetex-bin: Please don't. A "suggests" and possibly a warning on install is better
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 14:32:30 -0800
> PDF documentation from TeX files. If all they're using tetex-bin
> for is to generate HTML from Texinfo files, and the program to do
> that transformation isn't part of tetex-bin, then those other
> packages are broken, not tetex-bin.
I agreed.
Best regards, 2002.3.4
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: