Re: testing group -- please test the documentation
Thank you for your ansver,
you made a very good point there (see *a* below, HMH vs. tutorial).
Maybe we should split it in two documents, one printer ready HMH and one
tutorial.
May I try my hands on the HMH thing?
If so, it's requirements will be:
1, it should be printer ready, you'll need a paper copy of it
during install
2, it must be easy for the reader to syncronize between the screen
and the paper
3, fit in a Linux course
It will handle theese choises:
1, media: cdrom, nfs and ftp
2, profiles: BASIC and Standard Workstation
Are theese the right cases and requirments?
What channel is the best to discuss theese issues?
See you,
/Karl
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karl Hammar Aspö Data karl@kalle.csb.ki.se
Lilla Aspö 2340 0173 140 57
S-742 94 Östhammar 070 511 97 84 Professionella Linuxlösningar
Sweden
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Saturday 9 January 1999, at 23 h 5,
> "Karl B. Hammar" <karl@kalle.csb.ki.se> wrote:
> > Well lets doit then. (assuming cdrom on /dev/hdc)
> > Step one, choose a profile.
> This looks like more a HOWTO style. Actually, this is a fundamental choice,
*a*
> not just for this section. Should the documentation be an HMH (hold my hand)
> or a tutorial, which has to be digested by the user before use? Advices? The
> current installation document mixes the two styles, IMHO.
> --
> http://www.debian.org/~bortz/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-testing-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: