[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Debian Etch on SunFire V880



That is correct, Cheetah is the name of the CPU and the 880 can have up
to eight.  However, I'm not sure if that would be the problem.  When
trying to install gentoo on this box, just out of curiosity sake, it was
successful.

-----Original Message-----
From: Per Larsson [mailto:per.larsson@bahnhof.se] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Debian Sparc
Cc: Morgan Walker
Subject: Re: Debian Etch on SunFire V880

On my SunFire v440 I had a Solaris 9 installation running well with 4 
CPU modules.
With Debian it seems it indicated one as faulty, and I had to remove at 
least one module for Debian to work well.
Although it bugged out earlier for me, already during initial boot, 
until I removed one module...
Perhaps the error below is an indication of something similar, it could 
be an idea to strip the 880 down
to a minimum config and start from there ? I have a severe case of 
rookieness with Sparc and Debian,
but if I'm not mistaken the Cheetah is the name of the CPU, and the 880 
can have up to 8 of them ?
Regards
///Per



Morgan Walker skrev:
> I am using strictly the serial port for this installation.  Everything
> gets displayed via the serial port.  However, when I had the console
and
> serial port connected, something similar to what you described did
> happen.
>
> Ok, so I tried to netboot using a 2.6-18 boot.img and attached the
> output which I received.  Does anybody know what this means?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per Larsson [mailto:per.larsson@bahnhof.se] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 2:16 AM
> To: Debian Sparc
> Subject: Re: Debian Etch on SunFire V880
>
> Martin skrev:
>   
>> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:56 -0500, Morgan Walker wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I am at a total loss.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I am trying to install debian etch 3.1r5 netinst .iso on a SunFire
>>>       
> 880
>   
>>> w/ OBP version 4.18.2, scsi drives, and 4G of memory via serial
>>> console.  Every time it gets to "Booting Linux..." it appears to
hang
>>>       
> or
>   
>>> is just throwing the output somewhere else.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Silly question but have you checked whether it's using the serial
port
>> for output?  IIRC some systems, where the OpenBoot console is set to
>> default to serial port, it will print 'Booting Linux' on the console
>> (and even run OpenBoot on the console if you use the keyboard to
>> initiate it) and then output on the serial port.  Perhaps I'm
mistaken
>>     
> -
>   
>> it was a while ago and on a much older system.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>  - Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> I had issues with my v440 until I tried the "daily build" netinstall 
> image found here:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> Not sure if that will help in your case, but something to try perhaps
?
> Regards
>    ///Per
>
>
>   
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> net boot^H ^H^H ^H^H ^H^H ^H^H ^H^H ^H^H ^H^H ^Hboot net:dhcp -p
> Resetting ...
>
>
> Software Reset
>
> Enabling system bus....... Done
> Initializing CPUs......... Done
> Initializing boot memory.. Done
> Initializing OpenBoot
> ^QProbing system devices
> Probing I/O buses
> Probing system devices
> Probing I/O buses
>
>
> Sun Fire 880, No Keyboard
> Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> OpenBoot 4.18.2, 8192 MB memory installed, Serial #57216562.
> Ethernet address 0:3:ba:69:e:32, Host ID: 83690e32.
>
>
>
>
> Initializing    12MB of memory at addr        b0ff000000 -^H
I$
> Rebooting with command: boot net:dhcp -p
> Boot device: /pci@9,700000/network@1,1:dhcp  File and args: -p
>
|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H
|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^$
> PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 4.18.2 2005/06/30 07:53'
> PROMLIB: Root node compatible:
> Linux version 2.6.17-2-sparc64 (Debian 2.6.17-9) (waldi@debian.org)
(gcc version 4.1.2 20060901 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-13)) #1 $
> ARCH: SUN4U
> Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:69:0e:32
> Remapping the kernel... done.
> Booting Linux...
> CPU[0]: Caches D[sz(65536):line_sz(32)] I[sz(32768):line_sz(32)]
E[sz(8388608):line_sz(512)]
> Built 1 zonelists
> Kernel command line: -p
> PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
> Console: colour dummy device 80x25
> Dentry cache hash table entries: 1048576 (order: 10, 8388608 bytes)
> Inode-cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 9, 4194304 bytes)
> Memory: 8306520k available (2152k kernel code, 720k data, 144k init)
[fffff80000000000,000000b0ffb0e000]
> Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 20.00 BogoMIPS
(lpj=40005)
> Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized
> SELinux:  Disabled at boot.
> Capability LSM initialized
> Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
> checking if image is initramfs... it is
> Freeing initrd memory: 2796k freed
> NET: Registered protocol family 16
> PCI: Probing for controllers.
> SCHIZO0 PBMB: ver[7:0], portid 8, cregs[40004400000]
pregs[40004700000]
> SCHIZO0 PBMB: PCI CFG[7ffee000000] IO[7ffef000000] MEM[7fe00000000]
> SCHIZO0 PBMA: ver[7:0], portid 8, cregs[40004400000]
pregs[40004600000]
> SCHIZO0 PBMA: PCI CFG[7ffec000000] IO[7ffed000000] MEM[7fd00000000]
> SCHIZO1 PBMB: ver[7:0], portid 9, cregs[40004c00000]
pregs[40004f00000]
> SCHIZO1 PBMB: PCI CFG[7ffea000000] IO[7ffeb000000] MEM[7fc00000000]
> SCHIZO1 PBMA: ver[7:0], portid 9, cregs[40004c00000]
pregs[40004e00000]
> SCHIZO1 PBMA: PCI CFG[7ffe8000000] IO[7ffe9000000] MEM[7fb00000000]
> PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 1] to INO[1d]
> PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 1] to INO[1f]
> PCI1(PBMB): Bus running at 33MHz
> PCI1(PBMA): Bus running at 66MHz
> PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 1] to INO[1c]
> PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 5] to INO[18]
> PCI0(PBMB): Bus running at 33MHz
> PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 1] to INO[00]
> PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 2] to INO[04]
> PCI0(PBMA): Bus running at 66MHz
> ebus0: [flashprom] [bbc] [power] [i2c -> (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru)
(fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) (fru) $
> power: Control reg at 000007fc7e30002e ... not using powerd.
> usbcore: registered new driver usbfs
> usbcore: registered new driver hub
> NET: Registered protocol family 2
> IP route cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 8, 2097152 bytes)
> TCP established hash table entries: 1048576 (order: 10, 8388608 bytes)
> TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 524288 bytes)
> TCP: Hash tables configured (established 1048576 bind 65536)
> TCP reno registered
> chmc0: US3 memory controller at 0000040000400000 [ACTIVE]
> chmc1: US3 memory controller at 0000040000c00000 [ACTIVE]
> chmc2: US3 memory controller at 0000040001400000 [ACTIVE]
> ERROR(0): Cheetah error trap taken afsr[0010100000000000]
afar[0000040001c00000] TL1(0)
> ERROR(0): TPC[424d68] TNPC[424d6c] O7[6e2c30] TSTATE[80001606]
> ERROR(0): M_SYND(0),  E_SYND(0), Privileged
> ERROR(0): Highest priority error (0000100000000000) "Unmapped error
from system bus"
> ERROR(0): D-cache idx[0] tag[0000000000000000] utag[0000000000000000]
stag[0000000000000000]
> ERROR(0): D-cache data0[0000000000000000] data1[0000000000000000]
data2[0000000000000000] data3[0000000000000000]
> ERROR(0): I-cache idx[0] tag[0000000000000000] utag[0000000000000000]
stag[0000000000000000] u[0000000000000000] l[0000000000000000]
> ERROR(0): I-cache INSN0[0000000000000000] INSN1[0000000000000000]
INSN2[0000000000000000] INSN3[0000000000000000]
> ERROR(0): I-cache INSN4[0000000000000000] INSN5[0000000000000000]
INSN6[0000000000000000] INSN7[0000000000000000]
> ERROR(0): E-cache idx[0] tag[0000000000000000]
> ERROR(0): E-cache data0[0000000000000000] data1[0000000000000000]
data2[0000000000000000] data3[0000000000000000]
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Irrecoverable deferred error trap.
>
>  <0>Press Stop-A (L1-A) to return to the boot prom
>   
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.7/712 - Release Date:
2007-03-06 15:42
>   



Reply to: