On Friday 03 February 2006 01:11, Joey Hess wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > Do you think we should make an effort to support sparc32 using 2.6 > > for d-i? You said yourself that things were looking better and these > > reports seem to confirm it. > > This will be after the Beta2 release of the installer though. > > FWIW, my testing on that machine (wildebeest) consists of using d-i, > which seems to be working on sparc4c already. I've never done anything > with the machine except install Debian on it each day.. Hmmm. But that must mean it installs using 2.4 as ATM we don't have 2.6 support in d-i for sparc32. So how does this tell us anything about the state of 2.6 support for sparc32? Looking at the dilab logs, I only see 2.4 installs for wildebeest.
Attachment:
pgpIwSILCb3S0.pgp
Description: PGP signature