Frans Pop wrote: > Do you think we should make an effort to support sparc32 using 2.6 for > d-i? You said yourself that things were looking better and these reports > seem to confirm it. > This will be after the Beta2 release of the installer though. FWIW, my testing on that machine (wildebeest) consists of using d-i, which seems to be working on sparc4c already. I've never done anything with the machine except install Debian on it each day.. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature