Re: Weird kernel 2.6.17. behaviour
On 27/07/06, firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:41:56AM +0100, Adam Henley wrote:
> On 27/07/06, Sébastien Bernard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >email@example.com a écrit :
> >> I got a perfectly workable kernel 220.127.116.11 using mkinitramfs on my U60.
> >> Can you shed some lights on this dark corner of linux ?
> >> Seb
> I can't shed any more light on it, but I can look too :o)
:). It was just a poetic licence.
Me too :)
Well, I'm not arguing that the fix is a wrong fix.
And I'm *definitely* not ruling it out as a cause of your problems :)
I don't have the know-how, just trying to be helpful.Unfortunately I
don't have access to your arch of choice, otherwise I wouldn't be busy
installing Quake on my box in prep. for a company LAN party.