On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:12, Jon Biddell wrote: > All I'm saying, for what its worth, is that there are some people for > whom their old sparc32 is perfectly functional... Yes, but without people putting in the time and effort to get the (2.6) kernel properly supported on sparc32, it's still a no-go. You might want to read this bug report (ignore the flames) [1] for reference. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/319878
Attachment:
pgpWvBh8uM3pl.pgp
Description: PGP signature