Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:23:54 -0700
Andrew Sharp <andy@ccpu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote:
> > > Kent West wrote:
> > > > snert[@macs54]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > > > cpu : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+)
> > > > fpu : UltraSparc III+ integrated FPU
> > > > promlib : Version 3 Revision 5
> > > > prom : 4.5.16
> > > > type : sun4u
> > > > ncpus probed : 1
> > > > ncpus active : 1
> > > > Cpu0Bogo : 599.65
>
> Er, that doesn't look right. Even if you have one of those "hard-to-find"
> (heh) sunblade1000's with a 600MHz cpu, then this should be more like
> the other machines, ie., it should read Cpu0Bogo 1200.
Wrong. Ultra-III and later cpus schedule the delay loop differently
than earlier cpus do, so the number is going to be lower but this is
not because his cpu is slower than the other ones nor does it mean
that something is wrong with his machine or with the kernel.
His bogomips numbers are perfectly fine for a 600MHZ ultra-III.
Reply to: