Re: Are Sunblade 1000s slow?

[Elie De Brauwer <elie@de-brauwer.be>]

On Thursday 02 October 2003 19:29, Patrick Morris wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
> > snert[@macs54]:/home/snert> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > cpu             : TI UltraSparc III+ (Cheetah+)
> > fpu             : UltraSparc III+ integrated FPU
> > promlib         : Version 3 Revision 5
> > prom            : 4.5.16
> > type            : sun4u
> > ncpus probed    : 1
> > ncpus active    : 1
> > Cpu0Bogo        : 599.65
> > Cpu0ClkTck      : 0000000035a4e900
> > MMU Type        : Cheetah+
>
> Just for comparison, here's a dual-400 Ultra 2:
>
> cpu             : TI UltraSparc II  (BlackBird)
> fpu             : UltraSparc II integrated FPU
> promlib         : Version 3 Revision 19
> prom            : 3.19.0
> type            : sun4u
> ncpus probed    : 2
> ncpus active    : 2
> Cpu0Bogo        : 799.53
> Cpu0ClkTck      : 0000000017d76a6d
> Cpu1Bogo        : 799.53
> Cpu1ClkTck      : 0000000017d76a6d
> MMU Type        : Spitfire
> State:
> CPU0:           online
> CPU1:           online
>
> ...and a ...umm...  I *think* 333MHz Ultra 5, but I could be off by a few:
>
> cpu             : TI UltraSparc IIi
> fpu             : UltraSparc IIi integrated FPU
> promlib         : Version 3 Revision 25
> prom            : 3.25.1
> type            : sun4u
> ncpus probed    : 1
> ncpus active    : 1
> Cpu0Bogo        : 719.25
> Cpu0ClkTck      : 0000000015752a00
> MMU Type        : Spitfire

And while we're at it, this is a Sun Blade 100 with a 500 Mhz UltraSparc IIe.

helios@kafka:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
cpu             : TI UltraSparc IIe
fpu             : UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU
promlib         : Version 3 Revision 0
prom            : 4.0.45
type            : sun4u
ncpus probed    : 1
ncpus active    : 1
Cpu0Bogo        : 1002.70
Cpu0ClkTck      : 000000001debe980
MMU Type        : Spitfire


-- 
http://www.de-brauwer.be