Re: Kernel 2.4.16
"Tille, Andreas" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote:
>
> > Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel
> > version will only give you better performance (depending on what the
> > processor is), and who really needs that?
> Performance and security. Well NFS is insecure anyway and I'm sitting
> behind a firewall, but ...
When I said "Seriously" I was being facetious.
> > Anyway, this sounds like
> > it could be something as silly as the whitespace character(s) used.
> > Can you test for certain what they are on the three lines? Because
> > it seems like the the second two lines are working, soooooo maybe
> > you used a tab or two when the kernel server only likes spaces or
> > something silly like that.
> The lines are formated equally all with spaces (0x20). And I have to
> say that I did many many experiments with those lines. After deleting
> the broken line one other took its place. It's not that easy. :-(((
Sounds like maybe something is wrong with the preceding lines. How
about deleting all the comment lines before hand. Or adding one.
Mine looks like this:
benedict:/usr/share/kernel-package# cat /etc/exports
# /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be
exported
# to NFS clients. See exports(5).
/ 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0(rw,no_root_squash)
benedict:/usr/share/kernel-package#
a
Reply to: