Re: GLIBC 2.1 on sparc, a decision

To: Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>
Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GLIBC 2.1 on sparc, a decision
From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@pobox.com>
Date: 23 Mar 1999 22:42:23 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87d81ztmls.fsf@wsfs05.mckesson.com>
In-reply-to: Ben Collins's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:18:44 -0500 (EST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.GSO.3.96.990323091630.14542E-100000@ankara.visi.net>

>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net> writes:
    Ben> So do we want this, or should I apply the patch?

My $0.02? Skip the patch & recomplie.  We've got lots of time.

-- 
Stephen
---
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. - Bruce Schneier

Reply to:

References:
- Re: GLIBC 2.1 on sparc, a decision
  - From: Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>

Prev by Date: Re: utilizing keys (type 5 keyboard)
Next by Date: Kernel 2.2.1 (with sparc-2.2.1.diff applied) SMP memory leak ?
Previous by thread: Re: GLIBC 2.1 on sparc, a decision
Next by thread: Netscape strange errors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread