Re: /bin/kill is broken! (was Re: SIGPWR)
Anders Hammarquist wrote:
> >I'm trying to build sysvinit 2.74-4 but init.c refers to SIGPWR macro which
> >is not defined on sparc. Neither the kernel sparc sources (2.0.33 & 2.1.78
> >checked) nor the libc6-dev package provide it.
> >Refering to the manpage signal(7), SIGPWR could be 29, but it is also SIGLOST.
> >What is it's real value ?
> Aaargh! (or, I just tried to figure it out...) It seems that there is
> some confusion about which signals do what on the sparc. bash does not
> list a PWR signal, /bin/kill does. So I tried /bin/kill -PWR to see what
> signal I got:
> susan# /bin/kill -PWR $!
> + User defined signal 1 ./strace sleep 300
> Hmm, USR1 is 30 according to bash & signal.h. Lets try /bin/kill -USR1:
> susan# /bin/kill -USR1 $!
> + Bus error ./strace sleep 300
> It would seem that /bin/kill is sending signals according to i386 signal
Well, I fixed it. I'm uploading a new bsdutils release & file a bug along with
my patches to the maintainer.
> numbers... From what I can gather, sparc doesn't really have a PWR signal
> at the moment, Solaris (and presumably SunOS) use 19 (which is SIGCONT for
> us). This may be somthing to ask on the sparclinux list...
The UPS-HOWTO tells us to use USR1 if no SIGPWR available. However, SIGUSR1
already in used in init :-( In fact, the latest upsd package only makes use of
I move this discussion to the sparclinux list.
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
email@example.com | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com