Re: Does sparc need/want libc5 (i.e. non-g) versions of libraries?

To: James Troup <J.J.Troup@comp.brad.ac.uk>
Cc: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Does sparc need/want libc5 (i.e. non-g) versions of libraries?
From: Juan Cespedes <cespedes@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 1997 14:48:23 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.971105135141.2089H-100000@salmon.etsit.upm.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] dmmyb34o50e.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>

On 4 Nov 1997, James Troup wrote:

> I'm finally getting round to updating my packages which include 4
> shared libraries and I need to know if I should exclude the sparc from
> the building of the libc5 versions of the libraries?

	sparc has a working libc5, but we still don't have altgcc, so
it's difficult to build both libc5 and libc6 versions of the
libraries.

	But I hope we'll have altgcc some time soon :)  So, please,
don't treat sparc specially at all.

	Thanks.

-- 
Juan Cespedes


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to:

References:
- Does sparc need/want libc5 (i.e. non-g) versions of libraries?
  - From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@comp.brad.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Unidentified subject!
Next by Date: new setup & gcc problem
Previous by thread: Does sparc need/want libc5 (i.e. non-g) versions of libraries?
Next by thread: Unidentified subject!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread