[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What configuration prefix ?



On Wed, Dec 16, 1998 at 03:47:41PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > Yes.  Acronym overuse is bad, and DSP has been around for a long time. 
> > How about /opt/snapshots?
> > 
> > > What do people think of using /opt?  I think it's a better choice than
> > > putting things under /usr/local.  And we don't want to put things in
> > > the FSSTND locations, because we want to be able to install these at
> > > the same time as the released Debian packages without causing
> > > conflicts.
> > 
> > I'm not fond of /opt in general, but I agree the alternatives are
> > worse.
> 
> no /opt.  no /usr/local.  /usr/lib/snapshots is much better.
> debian should NOT touch those first 2.

No, I don't think so.  /usr/lib/snapshots is too cumbersome for this,
and I see no good reason not to use a SUBDIRECTORY of /opt - not
/opt/{bin,lib,etc}.

Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|     CMU, CS class of 2002      |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __   Part-Time Systems Programmer  |
|         dan@debian.org         |  |        drow@cs.cmu.edu         |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/


Reply to: