Re: The meeting with Boshiamy result
hashao wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Friday, July 21, 2000, 3:46:08 AM, you wrote:
>
> TC> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, hashao wrote:
> >> ˵µ½×ÖÌ壬Ç廪»¹ÊDZ±´óµÄÒ»¸öʲô¹«Ë¾(·½Õý£¿£©£¬ºÃÏñ°ÑÒ»¸öϵÁеÄ
> >> ¹ú±ê×ÖÌå·ÅÔÚÍøÉÏÃâ·ÑÏÂÔØ£¬Ò»Ì×¹²¡¡£¸£¸¡¡¸ö¡¡£Ô£Ô£Æ¡¡×ÖÌå°¡¡£
> >> µ¹ÊÇÓÖÏ£ÍûÈÃËûÃÇ°ÑÕâ¸ö×ÔÓÉÁË£¬·´ÕýÊÇ·ÅÔÚÍøÉÏÃâ·ÑÏÂÔØ¡£
> >> okey, ²éÁËһϣ¬±±´ó·½ÕýµÄÀ¼Í¤×ֿ⣬ÎÒÒÔÇ°Ìá¹ýûÓУ¿Ó¡ÏóÖкÃÏñÌá¹ý¡£¡¡
> >> or deja vu? http://www1.founderpku.com/fontweb/ È«Êǹú±êÂëµÄ£¬
> >> ·±¼ò×ÖÐͶ¼ÓС£
> >> ²»¹ý˵ʵÔڵģ¬×ÖÐÎÕâÖÖʶù£¬ÌṩһÁ½Ì×ϵͳ×Ö¿â¾ÍÐÐÁË£¬Èç¹ûÓû§
> >> ÓÐÐèÒª£¬×Ô¼ºÈ¥Âò»¹ÊǺÏÀíµÄ¡£µ½µ×ÕⶫÎ÷ÊÇÉݳÞÆ·£¬»¨Ç®Ò²ÊÇÓ¦¸ÃµÄ¡£
> >> ²»¹ý¿´µ½ 88 Ì××ÖÌåÃâ·ÑÏÂÔØ£¬»¹ÊÇ´óÁ÷¿ÚË®£¬È«ÏÂÔØÁË¡£ 300 ¶àÕ×£¬
> >> Óò»ÖøÒ²·ÅÔÚÄǶù£¬ÐÄÀïÊæ·þ¡£Òª²»¶Ô²»Æð×Ô¼º£¬Ò²¶Ô²»Æð·½Õý¡£
>
> TC> I downloaded those 88 fonts a few months ago. The "jian" ones (e.g.,
> TC> fzssjw.ttf) do not have all the characters in GBK, but just the GB2312 (as
> TC> far as I can tell) ones--no problem here. However, the "fan" ones (e.g.,
> TC> fzssfw.ttf) are very odd--while the glyphs are "fan" (traditional) ones,
> TC> they are allocated in the positions for their simplified
> TC> equivalents--something is wrong with the CMAP table in the fonts. e.g.,
> TC> simplified guo2 'country' is in U+56FD in the "jian" version fzssjw.ttf,
> TC> which is okay, but traditional guo2 'country' is in *U+56FD in the "fan"
> TC> version fzssfw.ttf, when it should really be at U+570B in that file. It
> TC> seems it is intended for someone who is typing a document using a "jian"
> TC> font, and thus, simplified characters, to instantly switch to a
> TC> "traditional characters" version by switching to a "fan" font, without
> TC> proper conversion of the codepoints. (In any case, the "fan" ones only
> TC> have slightly more characters than the "jian" ones, but not enough to
> TC> cover all the characters in Big5, even if someone were to fix the CMAP's.)
>
> hehehe, it is what it mean to be. It is a GB font with an tranditional
> type face. It is still a GB font no matter if it has a simplified or
> traditional type face. I think the purpose of the tranditional GB font
> is for people who are used to read tranditional text but need to load
> GB text.
>
> Of course if we are allowed to modify the font, we can convert its
> cmap to big5 one with a program and fill in some missed glyph from
> other big5 fonts. But I don't think we are allowed to do it now, and
> the result will not be pretty (mixed typeface in one font).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> hashao mailto:hashao@china.com.n.s.pam
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-simplified-chinese-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
û´í,±±´ó·½ÕýµÄ·±ÌåTTFÊǹú±êϵÁеÄ,¾ßÌåÊÇGB/T12345-90(GB1)(·±Ìå),Ò²¾ÍÊÇGb2312-80
µÄ·±Ìå°æ,µ«ÓÖºÍGB2312²»ÊÇÒ»Ò»¶ÔÓ¦.¸öÈËÈÏΪÕâºÜÈÝÒ×Ôì³É»ìÂÒ.ÕâÒ²ÄÑΪÖƶ¨±ê×¼µÄÈËÁË.
GB2312Ò²²»ÊǺÜÌåÏÖÒ»ÖÂÐÔµÄ.Ò»¼¶×Ö¿â°´ÕÕÆ´ÒôÅÅÁÐ,¶þ¼¶×Ö¿â°´Õձʻ®ÅÅÁÐ.ÕâҲΪÄÑÏë½øÐÐ
ºº×ÖÅÅÐòµÄÈËÁË.GBK¼æÈÝGB2312,×Ö»ãºÍISO10646Ïàͬ,À©Õ¹²¿·Ö°´ÕÕISO10646ÏàËƵĹæÔòÅÅÁÐ.
GBK<<ºº×ÖÀ©Õ¹ÄÚÂë¹æ·¶>>²»Êǹú±ê,²îÒ»µã,Êǹ淶.GB18030<<ÐÅÏ¢¼¼ÊõºÍÐÅÏ¢½»»»Óúº×Ö±àÂë×Ö·û¼¯>>
ÊÇËÄ×ֽڵıê×¼,¼æÈÝGBK,Ä¿Ç°×Ö»ã´ó¸ÅºÍunicode3.0Ï൱.µ«²»ÖªË¿ÉÒÔ³ö×ÖÌå,X
windowÏÂÈçºÎ
ʹÓÃËÄ×Ö½Ú×ÖÌå.²»ÖªµÀË¿ÉÒÔ½²½²Big5µÄ±àÂë¹æÔò?
ÆäʵÎÒÃDz»±Ø¹ý¶à¿¼ÂǼòÌåºÍ·±ÌåµÄ×ÖÌåÎÊÌâ,ʹÓÃISO10646±àÂëµÄTTF¿ÉÒԺܼòµ¥µÄ½â¾ö
Õâ¸öÎÊÌâ.Èç¹ûʹÓùýxfsft»òX-TT¾ÍÖªµÀÔõôһ»ØÊÂÁË.ÎÒÃÇËùȱµÄÖ»ÊǶ½´Ù³§ÉÌ¿ª·¢¿ª·Å·ûºÏ
ISO10646µÄTTF.½¨Òé´ó¼ÒʹÓÃTTF,ÔÚ×°ÔغÍËõ·Å·½ÃæÒªºÃÓÚpcf,ÉèÖÃÒ²ºÜ¼òµ¥.
shuyong 2000/07/21
Reply to: