[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: aptitude upgrade vs. apt-get upgrade

* Thomas Hungenberg <th+lists-debian@demonium.de> wrote:
> Piotr Drozdek wrote:
> > I don't have any packages with 'id' status in my system. I don't know
> > what they mean. Maybe somebody can help?
> I think 'd' marks packages for deletion?
> However, I have not requested to delete all these packages.
> > But - to resolve your problem: can you just do this upgrade (8 packages)
> > now?
> > And upgrade tex-common manually:
> > aptitude install tex-common=2.08.1
> The problem with the missing update of tex-common can be solved by
> using either 'apt-get upgrade' or 'aptitude full-upgrade'.
> However, I still wonder what's going wrong with 'aptitude update'.
> Maybe a lot of other people who update their systems this way are
> missing some security updates?

Did you read my mail from yesterday? 
My aptitude upgraded tex-common at March 23 via normal safe-upgrade.
Mabe you should take a look at your /var/log/aptitude.log and find out
whats wrong on *your* system and why som much packets are status 'id'

Reply to: