Hi! * Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de> [050130 20:29]: > > how does it come, that every time, you're telling such a story and are > > requested for some proof, one of your services is down, you cite > > completly unrelated URLs or you don't answer at all? > Why not go to <http://lists.debian.org/> and search for it ? May I add this as an other case of "MK makes statements which she can't proofe" to my list? Making a statement, and telling others to proof it for themself doesn't make your argument look very good. But anyway, I'm subscribed to both lists, and all I can say is: Been there, done that, got no shirt. So until I'm showed otherwise, I'm convident, that there is no mail to debian-devel or debian-kernel, stating that support for the 2.4.18* kernels in the current stable release has been dropped. And beside that, Joeys, forwarded to this list by Jan Minar a couple of hours ago (id: <[🔎] 20050130160656.GF6240@kontryhel.haltyr.dyndns.org>) proofes, that you are wrong. Yours sincerely, Alexander PS: I'm still waiting for proofs of other statements you made for example in the -user-german list, like "Google runs 100000 Debian servers" or "DDs develop only Debian software, Maintainers maintain packages" and some others. PPS: Are you aware that there are guys out there, thinking of collecting all your contraticting, unproofen or proofen wrong statements to a "Michelle Konzack"-FAQ? Luckily for you no one has the time for this sisyphos job. -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature