On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:56:18PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:27:52AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Michael Stone wrote: > dealing with packages which will not be maintainable over the course of > a stable release. Apache doesn't meet that criterion because its Wasn't there a big thread about exactly this issue, centered around amavis, clamav and snort a while ago?Yes, the answer is volatile.debian.net(.org) as you prefer.
No, that's the answer to a different question. (What to do with software that's inherently dependent on volatile information, like virus or ids signatures.) Mike Stone