On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 06:30:01PM +0200, Daniel Faller wrote: > On Monday 02 July 2001 18:25, you wrote: > > ipmasquerading? > > No, they have public ip's and I would like to keep this setting. The clients > config should not change at all. Then I would go with bridging all the way. I use it here at home to join 100baseT and 10base2 ethernet together. I see no reason why you can't set up a packet filter on the bridge as well. (I may of course be totally wrong). -- Leo Howell M5AKW freenet:MSK@SSK@2vz8xnhEJyJOlBVNfBEOWaohQFEQAgE/freesite//
Attachment:
pgpg9e2piC9pd.pgp
Description: PGP signature