Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package
Dear Sebastien,
> Sorry, there is already a stanza for these files, but you need to add
> config/dmalloc_return.h which is not listed there.
Ok, I've added this file in d/copyright
> Also, I tried to build the package, and got these lintian errors/messages that should be fixed:
> E: rheolef source: malformed-override Possibly wrong package in override at line 10 (got librheolef-dev, expected rheolef)
> I: rheolef source: vcs-field-not-canonical https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef.git https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/rheolef
> I: rheolef source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package rheolef
The "E" is fixed: now d/source/lintian-overrides has the right file format.
The first "I" is also fixed, by removing the .git suffix, tganks to your advice
For the last "I", I really don't understand the message... have an idea ?
It seems it is neither and error nor a warning in lintian.
Now lintian issues a warning:
W: librheolef-dev: manpage-section-mismatch usr/share/man/man7/index_set.7rheolef.gz:8 7rheolef != 7
but I really do not know what to to (all unix man pages are automatically extracted from comments in source files).
Perhaps a fix will be possible in the upstream source for a next version.
Are the debianization files ready for an upload in Debian ?
Many thanks for yours advices and help,
Pierre
--
Pierre.Saramito@imag.fr
Directeur de Recherche CNRS
Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France
http://ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito
(for the latter, you should basically drop the .git suffix from Vcs-Browser in debian/control)
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
Reply to: