Re: Debhelper for R packages (accepted)
On 08/10/16 20:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 8 October 2016 at 20:01, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> | I couldn't agree more. I'm a cdbs fan, and some of my packages I maintain with
> | neither cdbs nor dh. So I was _very_ happy to find out cdbs was the tool used
> | by many r-cran packages, when I started packaging r-cran stuff. Don't get me
> | wrong: I am happy we now can use dh to build r-cran packages: more choice is
> | always welcome. So: thanks a lot Gordon and Dylan for your work. I however
> | won't immediately start converting my r-cran packages from cdbs to dh-r.
>
> Spot on, and agreed. Andreas et al did well with the updates to r-cran.mk,
> and the cdbs approach is serving us well -- but needs an update. dh-r may fit
> that bill.
>
dh-r was accepted to unstable today. You are of course free to use it,
or not, as you see fit.
Gordon
Reply to: