Re: SuperLU

[Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>]

Looks good.  From the man page, they've updated --ddeb-migration to 
--dbgsym-migration.  We might as well use the current nomenclature.

Drew


On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 16:32 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Thanks for the hint! Did just that.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nico
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:11 PM Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi Nico
> > 
> > You can copy what I did for deal.ii here [1].
> > The updated version of debhelper is needed so that it understands
> > ddebs.
> >   The version after 'dh_strip --ddeb-migration' is the new version
> > number (the one you are uploading) suffixed with a '~'.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Graham
> > 
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/deal.ii.git
> > /commit/?id=a3dd3b46448be9cb2107b1eb4fa0c21adee95fb7
> > 
> > 
> > On 23/05/2016 14:51, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > >> W: libsuperlu5-dbg: empty-binary-package
> > >>   Looks like debug symbols automatically went into libsuperlu5-
> > dbgsym,
> > >>   so libsuperlu5-dbg is redundant (i.e. rename in
> > debian/control. Or
> > >> specify -dbg as the debug package in debian/rules, e.g. with
> > dh_strip).
> > >
> > > If it's build automatically, can't we just get rid of the -dbg
> > entry in
> > > debian/control altogether?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Nico
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer@gma
> > il.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>> That's dodgy how upstream handled the non-free in
> > MATLAB/time.m.  All
> > >> they did was delete Mathwork's copyright statement. It's on
> > their head.
> > >>
> > >> Indeed. All files that are listed as exceptions from the BSD
> > license
> > >> (except mc64ad.*) in debian/copyright now have a BSD copyright
> > header as
> > >> well, btw. It very much looks like they are dual-licensed now.
> > Shall we
> > >> take this for granted? I guess we could remove some complication
> > from
> > >> debian/copyright with this.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Nico
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:19 PM Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.or
> > g> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Should be good to go.
> > >>>
> > >>> That's dodgy how upstream handled the non-free in
> > MATLAB/time.m.  All
> > >>> they did was delete Mathwork's copyright statement. It's on
> > their head.
> > >>>
> > >>> Drew
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 10:15 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > >>>> Drew,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 5.2.1 came out yesterday with some of my PRs applied. Can you
> > import
> > >>>> it please? I'd then go through the remaining issues.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Nico
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:43 PM Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.
> > org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 11:00 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > >>>>>>> More important is that some dfsg files are still in the git
> > >>>>> tree.
> > >>>>>>> MATLAB/{spypart.m,time.m} and DOC/*ug.pdf.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Aha yes. (Is the user guide really nonfree?)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The argument is that the pdf is the useful bit, like a binary
> > >>>>> program.
> > >>>>>   Just as we need the source for binary files, for the same
> > reason
> > >>>>> we
> > >>>>> want the source (the latex files) for the pdf files.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Unfortunately, I have no experience with automatically
> > creating
> > >>>>> dfsg
> > >>>>>> tarballs, and there's a fair chance I'll do it incorrectly.
> > I'd
> > >>>>>> appreciate if someone could take over from here.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I've tidied up the dfsg handling, listing the reject files in
> > >>>>> debian/copyright.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The package builds fine (and petsc3.7 seems happy with it).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The last step is to check lintian,
> > >>>>>    lintian -i superlu_5.2.0+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> There's a handful of warnings, have a go at fixing them:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> W: superlu source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
> > >>>>> (paragraph at line 109)
> > >>>>>   There are 2 licence short-names "permissive". Give one a
> > distinct
> > >>>>>   short name from the other. permissive-colamd or something.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> W: superlu source: ancient-standards-version 3.9.5 (current
> > is
> > >>>>> 3.9.8)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> W: libsuperlu5-dbg: empty-binary-package
> > >>>>>    Looks like debug symbols automatically went into
> > libsuperlu5-
> > >>>>> dbgsym,
> > >>>>>    so libsuperlu5-dbg is redundant (i.e. rename in
> > debian/control.
> > >>>>> Or
> > >>>>> specify -dbg as the debug package in debian/rules, e.g. with
> > >>>>> dh_strip).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for your packaging efforts.
> > >>>>> Drew
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>> Nico
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM Drew Parsons <dparsons@debi
> > an.or
> > >>>>> g>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 09:49 +0000, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> I've pushed some more changes to [1] (including a patch)
> > and
> > >>>>> it's
> > >>>>>>> now
> > >>>>>>>> compiling and installing alright. I guess a review would
> > be
> > >>>>> in
> > >>>>>>> order.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>> Nico
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1] alioth:/git/debian-science/packages/superlu.git
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> >