[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question about sponsoring a package



A Divendres, 23 de maig de 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr va escriure:
> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@alaxarxa.net> writes:
> > Testing the generated package it has easy warnings to fix, but more than 
one 
> > hundred:
> >
> > libpcl-tools: binary-without-manpage 
> >
> > I have tried to generate with help2man man pages but not with a great 
success. 
> > I know that the New maintainers guide insist that the maintainer mush 
write 
> > the man page, but it's too much work to done that.
> 
> This is not just required by lintian, but also by the policy [1]. I
> would also not be lucky to have >100 executables lying around without
> the standard documentation (which manpages are).
> 
> Can you be a bit more specific about your difficulties in writing the
> manpages? 

time?

It's a lot of work. I have had some script that have generated with the 
help2man something usable. Let we see it it works.

Thanks,

Regards,

Leopold

-- 
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: