Re: Last call before metapackage creation for Wheezy
Hi Filippo,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> could you add
>
> mmass - Mass spectrometry tool for proteomics
> mmass-modules - Mass spectrometry tool for proteomics - extension modules
> python-mzml - mzML mass spectrometric data parsing
> python-mzml-doc - mzML mass spectrometric data parsing - documentation
> tandem-mass - mass spectrometry software for protein identification
>
> to the same category as massxpert:
> http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/chemistry
$ svn diff
Index: chemistry
===================================================================
--- chemistry (Revision 3735)
+++ chemistry (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -162,6 +162,14 @@
Depends: pdb2pqr
+Depends: mmass, mmass-modules
+
+Depends: python-mzml
+
+Suggests: python-mzml-doc
+
+Depends: tandem-mass
+
Depends: openchrom
Homepage: http://www.openchrom.net/
License: EPL
Commited.
Comments:
1. Any DD has commit permissions to
svn://svn.debian.org/blends/projects/science/trunk/debian-science/
so you can easily add things yourself
2. Regarding the task chemistry I have some mixed feelings: IMHO it
would be better to depend from all DebiChem packages because this
decreases the maintenance effort (you only need to specify a
chemistry related package once). As long as the automatic resolving
of dependencies (as mentioned here in the thread for med-bio and
med-bio-dev in the science-biology task) is not implemented it
makes some sense as it is now (by specifying single packages) but
I hope to get this solved until end of this year (finally).
3. I have put python-mzml-doc only as "suggests" because we do currently
not Depend from *-doc packages. Hope this is fine for you. I would
even say that if python-mzml itself suggests (or even recommends)
python-mzml-doc it should not be specified here.
Kind regards and thanks for the hint
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: