Re: cctbx debian package
On Thu, 19. Jul 11:09, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:42:07 +0200
> Radostan Riedel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18. Jul 15:15, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > > In that case we should work with the cbf maintainer and see if the
> > > python binding could be package on its own, do
> > > 1) check that both cbf python binding are equivalent
> > CCTBX provides a more recent version of cbflib. But the python bindings are
> > building with the provided setup.py. It creates a _pycbf.so extension.
> you should fill also a bug for the new version :)
I know but there already is a wishlist Bug#594600 for the new upstream version.
> can you provide a compile option for this until we solved the libcbf package issue.
> so it will be easy for use to switch from the bundeled pycbf and the official pycbf.
You mean like: --with_pycbf
It's not a problem to skip the build since no other extension depends on the
pycbf module during the build. I did a 'grep' and the only file in cctbx
depending during runtime is cbflib_adaptbx/command_line/dump.py and this looks
like it's part of a dispatcher script.