Re: Qt3 removal rational
> On 02/10/2011 09:10 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> > If qt3 is really popular with scientific apps, which presumably are slow
>>> > moving targets which are not esaily /quickly ported to qt4, it should be
>>> > enough motivation for the people who need qt3 to take on the maintenance, so
>>> > no need to burden the QA team. You need a piece of software, you do the
>>> > necessary packaging work - it's that simple, at least in theory.
>> Reposting on -science as maybe somebody hadn't seen it.
>> Anybody still maintaining Qt3 apps?
The qcad package will be removed soon. I have a working package of
LibreCAD, a fork which ported it to qt4.