Re: Qt3 removal rational
On 02/10/2011 09:10 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> > If qt3 is really popular with scientific apps, which presumably are slow
>> > moving targets which are not esaily /quickly ported to qt4, it should be
>> > enough motivation for the people who need qt3 to take on the maintenance, so
>> > no need to burden the QA team. You need a piece of software, you do the
>> > necessary packaging work - it's that simple, at least in theory.
> Reposting on -science as maybe somebody hadn't seen it.
> Anybody still maintaining Qt3 apps?
QtDMM and it will die with the Qt4-only transition.
There is QtDMM2 using Qt4, which I yet did not have
a closer look at.