Re: Repository?
[ Friday 16 May 2008 ]
| On Fri, 16 May 2008, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
| >> Regarding blitz, I often use blitz and I am quite knowledgeable in the
| >> underlying techniques. Let me know if you need some help.
| >
| > So I think it is to blitz maintainer to decide whether he wants to
| > join pkg-scicomp of debian-science as both seems to be relevant.
|
| Well, I (while wearing my libblitz++ maintainer hat) am not really picky
| about with whom to share the work (which seems quite less because of nearly
| dead upstream) but I (while wearing my Debian Science CDD hat) prefer the
| idea of a general, well-structured common Debian Science repository and
| thus I'd prefer this VCS. Saying so I plan to inject libblitz over the
| weekend there.
Ok and thanks for maintaining blitz++
| > I understand from your message pkg-scicomp is not designed to gather
| > more general scientific software outside the scope you gave
| > above. blitz in this case was both in the pkg-scicomp and
| > debian-science scope (the latter one being broader).
|
| Which I prefer because I consider the work to be done not only as packaging
| work. There is no problem in adding further Uploaders - even a pkg-scicomp
| mailing list might be listed as "Uploaders".
Ok
Best regards
C.
--
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~prudhomm/
Scientific computing packages maintainer
Fingerprint = 3703 50DE 7A9F 024E 0F26 0D07 A18F B40B D4BE 1450
Reply to: