RFS emails missing the actual intent of the request

[Utkarsh Gupta <guptautkarsh2102@gmail.com>]

Hey,

Thanks for all your work in the past weeks but all (or at least most)
of your emails are missing an important aspect of the RFS mail: the
main intent behind the work. For instance, you say package X is
updated and is lintian clean so here's an RFS, but WHY was this
package X updated in the first place is something that's missing in
your emails. I really suggest adding them as it's very important.

We don't generally update libraries just because there's a new version
available so having that reason behind your RFS mail would actually
help in understanding the ultimate goal of updating the package.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.


- u