[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS emails missing the actual intent of the request



Hi Utkarsh,

On 24/08/22 02:47, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
Hey,

Thanks for all your work in the past weeks but all (or at least most)
of your emails are missing an important aspect of the RFS mail: the
main intent behind the work. For instance, you say package X is
updated and is lintian clean so here's an RFS, but WHY was this
package X updated in the first place is something that's missing in
your emails. I really suggest adding them as it's very important.

We don't generally update libraries just because there's a new version
available so having that reason behind your RFS mail would actually
help in understanding the ultimate goal of updating the package.

Thanks for pointing it out. I have explained in reply to my RFS email now. Please check.


Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.


- u

--
Ravi Dwivedi
https://ravidwivedi.in

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x5E9F47BE14DD8BE6.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: