Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
On 6/27/15, Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org> wrote:
> Another thing, in the debian/copyright file, the license for ext/libev/*
> is BSD-2-clause or GPL-2+. Instead of one standalone License paragraph
> entitled "BSD-2-clause or GPL-2+", you should have to distinct
> paragraph: one "BSD-2-clause" and the other "GPL-2+". The GPL-2+ is
> already there. Shorten the other one to contain only the BSD-2-clause
> license, and change its title accordingly.
Done!
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
- From: Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
- From: Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
- From: Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
- From: Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
- From: Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com>
- Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
- From: Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org>