Re: RFS: ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io
On 6/27/15, Cédric Boutillier <boutil@debian.org> wrote:
> I looked at ruby-nio4r. The package declares a build-dependency on
> libev-dev, but doesn't seem to use it: the package has a convenience
> copy of libev in ext, and uses the header from there.
>
> Could you try to patch the source to make it use libev-dev, and possibly
> remove the convenience copy of libev?
I don't think it's possible: the included copy of libev is patched
one, and with stock version of libev nio4r test suite has 2 failures.
Maybe somebody with deep knowledge of libev can create proper wrappers
for patched functions but I can't. So I propose to remove libev-dev
from BD and build with included copy of it.
Reply to: