On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 07:21:11PM -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > > 2. http://raa.ruby-lang.org/project/markaby mentions its license is > > > same as that of ruby's. > > > > This is the website hosting version 0.4 of markaby. Version 0.5 is > > hosted on rubyforge, but does not contain any info about the licence. > > This version 0.5 was packaged by Paul van Tilburg where the MIT license > > was indicated. Paul, if you read this, could you indicate where you get > > the licence from? > This is very weird. You should probably contact the upstream developers > and ask them to add an explicity copyright message in the sources, > probably in the README. Did it already, but no answer so far. https://github.com/markaby/markaby/issues/30 > > > 3. Your dep5 format url is not working. Use dep.debian.net url > > > > Indeed. This url was generated automatically by gem2deb. It is not clear > > for me that we should use dep.debian.net right now. Althought dep-5 is > > frozen, its status is just candidate, and not accepted yet. The example > > given in DEP-5 refers to a version of the markdown file kept in the svn rep= > > ository. > Since 1) DEP's are not mandatory anyway and 2) DEP-5 format is not > likely to change radically anymore, IMO it's ok to point to > dep.debian.net. Ok. > > The problem with the url generated by gemdeb seems to come from the > > op=file operand, which probably worked with wsvn, but does not with > > viewvc. Changing it to view=co solves this issue, and allows to refer to > > a specific version of this standard. > > > > I have change the url for ruby-markaby in the repository. > > > > A lot of other packages are affected by this problem (list below). > > Should we consider a massive patching of the copyright files to have a > > working url? > Yes. Ok, I can try to do that. Best wishes, Cédric
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature