[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: docbook for papers/theses



also sprach Benj. Mako Hill <mako@atdot.cc> [2007.02.01.1518 +0000]:
> The reason you would do it in DocBook instead of LaTeX is because
> you want better transformations into HTML/text/RTF, because you
> want to pull text from sources in DB or want to move things into
> DB later (e.g., into technical documentation in Debian), because
> you just don't like LaTeX or find it ugly, or any number of other
> reasons.
>
> If you only want to output to printed pages/PDF and you are just
> as comfortable writing in DB as LaTeX, there's really no reason.

In the days of most search engines indexing PDF files, I am not sure
of the benefits of HTML, and I couldn't even conceive a use case for
RTF.

Thanks for the explanation.

> You were the one who asked the questions, so I figured you must
> have you own reasons already. :)

/me blames Lo-lan-do.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"on the other hand, with the advent of msvc 5, i can claim i use
 emacs because it's smaller and more efficient." :-)"
                                                    -- darin johnson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Reply to: