Re: kind of special transition for luajit{,2}?
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 19:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05-06-2022 19:35, M. Zhou wrote:
> > > But if this is really the result of the rebuild. I think we just
> > > discovered a serious flaw. The alternative dependency on libluajit-5.1-2
> > > just lost its version constraint, as it's only added to libluajit2-5.1-2.
> >
> > Ummmm... Yes, that's a good catch.
> >
> > I fixed this versioned dependency issue with the following commit:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/lua-team/luajit/-/commit/561f846d9c84587ffff6715eef086aeb9ff0fd80
> > (pending to upload to unstable upon transition approval)
>
> Ha, but because libluajit2-5.1-2 is new, it doesn't require a version
> AFAICT.
Technically yes. And the first version of src:luajit2 is greater than that number.
But logically luajit2 (<= 2.1~) may be really missing symbols based on the src:luajit
symbol control file tracking record.
So either way works for us. Let's go ahead with it.
Reply to: