On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Jelmer, > > On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of > > lintian-brush from testing. > > Can you elaborate why it's tricky (not promising anything, but there > could be reasons for t-p-u)? The current autoremoval is scheduled for > August 8, which is *after* the tentative release date. There have been updates to the other packages that relate to lintian-brush - both dependencies (python-tr, debmutate, upstream-ontologist, buildlog-consultant) and reverse dependencies ((silver-platter); we'd have to either roll those back in unstable as well or instead patch lintian-brush with a set of changes to lintian-brush that isn't really a roll back. (I appreciate that some of those changes probably should have gone to experimental) > > Of the reverse dependencies, routine-update can > > hopefully be updated easily (I've already pinged Andreas) to skip lintian-brush > > and silver-platter should probably not make it into bullseye (I've just filed a > > removal request for it). > > I'll handle the removals. Thanks! Cheers, Jelmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature