Hi Jelmer, On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of > lintian-brush from testing. Can you elaborate why it's tricky (not promising anything, but there could be reasons for t-p-u)? The current autoremoval is scheduled for August 8, which is *after* the tentative release date. > Of the reverse dependencies, routine-update can > hopefully be updated easily (I've already pinged Andreas) to skip lintian-brush > and silver-platter should probably not make it into bullseye (I've just filed a > removal request for it). I'll handle the removals. Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature