Hi, On 12-07-2021 01:20, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: >>> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of >>> lintian-brush from testing. >> >> Can you elaborate why it's tricky (not promising anything, but there >> could be reasons for t-p-u)? The current autoremoval is scheduled for >> August 8, which is *after* the tentative release date. > > There have been updates to the other packages that relate to > lintian-brush - both dependencies (python-tr, debmutate, > upstream-ontologist, buildlog-consultant) and reverse dependencies > ((silver-platter); we'd have to either roll those back in unstable as > well or instead patch lintian-brush with a set of changes to lintian-brush that isn't really a > roll back. Still not promising anything, but what would be the proposed change in t-p-u? >>> Of the reverse dependencies, routine-update can >>> hopefully be updated easily (I've already pinged Andreas) to skip lintian-brush >>> and silver-platter should probably not make it into bullseye (I've just filed a >>> removal request for it). >> >> I'll handle the removals. Sebastian beat me to it. Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature